Got Pissed! : Hellblazer Edition

Yep, I had to be the minority of the minorty again. I could have read Sandman, I could have read Hellboy, but noooooooooo. As always, wanting to be least numerous minority ever, I read Hellblazer.

Ever heard of Hellblazer? Probably not. It's the comic of John Constantine. You probably watched the movie, so yeah that John. Kinda.

I'm going to complain about this writer. What's her name, Phil?

Mary Sheldon.

No it isn't. Don't fucking lie to me you sick pervert.

Ok, I looked it up it's; Denise Mina.

Close enough.

No it isn't. The name is complet-uhhhhhhh.

Right off the bat I knew the writer was a women, I didn't looked up the name at first and just dived in. Don't ask me how I know, I just do. It's one of my many psychic powers. Something about the dialog and way people conversed with each other gave it away. Then I looked at her wiki, yep, a women.

There is always this thing about inter-gender writing. Something that just doesn't click. When a man writes a woman, the female character always feels like a man wrote her and vice versa. Men written by women feels...somehow different than real men, more fictional per say. And this is understandable since you can only become a man or a women and don't know exactly how the other side feels.

Yeah, right. You're a gender binary asshole.

What I'm trying to say that it is biology, one hormone or the other. Who the fuck are you anyway? Get the fuck outta here.

I am your worst nightmare, I AM THE DEFENDER OF TRANSPEOPLE ALL AROUND THE-

I said get out. Now is appreciated.

Fear me.

Get out or I start cutting your bleedy bits with a saw.

Who the fuck was that, anyway?

Beats me.

We need a door guard, Phil. Everyone without a leash is walking in these days.

I'm not volunteering.

You wouldn't do. We need someone strong and capable. I can't have the door unattented just because you ran off to fuck some donkeys or something.

I don't do donkeys. It's a common misconception that-

Whatever Phil. I don't really care.

This Mary Sheldon, was a late addition to the Hellblazer family and at first(like always), I hated her style.
You need good bits in there to win my heart. And to my suprise she did. But let's begin with the bad bit.

This is a bad entry to the saga, lady.

1: John is pulling a magic knife from his sleeve like somekind of thug.

2: He killed these deamon things like a well trained commando.

3: What the fuck is that shit? Is this an anime?

You got me pissed, Mary. Real pissed.

Her name is Denise, you idiot.

Oh, right. So Denise, we need to talk about this part. John is not an asskicker. In fact he is at it's best when he got his ass kicked.

Even Garth Ennis got this shit sorted out. John isn't a winner so your entire scene is...incomprehensible. I mean, do I supposed to be impressed? Or maybe you wanted to do a twist? Whatever the reason was, this was the worst scene since Garth Ennis' stuff. And oh boi, I have lots to complain about Ennis. In the future perhaps. Don't take this the wrong way Denise. You just happen to be at the wrong part of my mind when the night dragged on.

Something "dragged" on alright.

I was trying to say that she fell into the bullseye at the wrong-

"Bull's Eye". I hear ya.

Are you done mocking me?

Perhaps.

The best kicking John had.

John always got his ass kicked and sometimes horribly. His skill base is trickery and deceit, not combat. The scene was a shocker and that was the worst part of it. It came out of nowhere and led to nowhere. Maybe it was a "Now John is kicking ass." moment but it really wasn't. If the scene was John pulling up some magical trick on them, it would be neater. But that's just my opinion. And as you all know MY OPINION IS LAW.

So now onto the good bits.

This bit was clever and funny. I like it. Yes, in contrary to common belief I am capable of liking things.

I like this character.

She is the first character to hit John for a fag and that's impressive. Anyhow even if someone did it before, which I cannot recall, this one was the winner.

She is funny.

And witty.

And she has preferences and personality. Like a real human being.

I don't know if this was because the writer was a woman, which in my theory write their own kin better than their male counterparts or because it was just plain good writing.

In both cases, good job Denise.

Wow, are we really gonna end this on a high note? Like for real.

What's so bad with some complimentary?

Besides don't you worry, I will be back as the harbinger of doom in the next post. I will rip human society apart and put it back together like a Frankenstein monster.

Phil o Zoophily : Nature of Religious Hierarchy

We are together once again for another discussion. I promise that this one is going to suck as the last one.

Can't start without the firing bridage, mate.

Hi, Phil. There's something wrong with your face.

What? I'm smiling.

It looks like a truck ran over you.

Fine. What are we talking about today?

I woke up and got pissed at some religious dudes fucking up the world for their own gain.

Oh, I see. You got mad because the corruption of information and the suffering of innoce...

No, I got pissed because some piss poor ideology makes shit tons of money while I sit here on my ass.

That's what I like about you, no alturistic bullshit, direct and evil as always.

Let's get started, hit em up with the diagram Phil!

Take this, cocksuckers!

Oh shit!

Good job, dumbass. And you called them cocksuckers too.

So what?

Now they're gonna get angry and don't read the post.

Do they even read it in the first place?

Probably not.

Thanks to Phil we broke the first diagram so here is a new one.

The religious people come in four different castes and this is true for almost all religions.

First of we have the Sincerely Stupid:

These are the people that really believe in the magical mumbo jumbo of their religions. No they don't trace a logic train into their beliefs, they come across these magical ideas and just accept them.
To be fair most of these people are granted their faith from young age, and we all know that everything looks awesome when you are a kid. I am currently negotiating a deal with lucifer to grant me soul-vampire powers so that I can become a kid once again by eating the meat of young children.

Not gonna happen, Lambda.

Hi, Luci. What do you mean by that?

I won't let you hurt little children, the deal is off.

Well, lesser of two evils I guess.

Sincerely stupid also never leave their idea garden and never actually going to learn what the other religions are all about.
If they are muslim, they will claim that christians drink the blood of little children in their sunday prayers.
If they are christian, same thing vice versa.
In one such instance I came across the religious news reporter reported that Gangnam Style is a satanistic christian buddhist ateist child-sacrificing deamon ritual dance.
...
I'm not making that up.
They will be hearing these things about other religions and without knowing what they actually are just gonna put words together to make sentences.
Sincerely Stupid involves, old people, idiots, people who are not be able to travel widely(ie indian villagers).
And even though they are given the chance to read these materials and expend their theological knowledge base, they just won't do it. They are content with Facebook and don't bother reading two minute article on what this Buddhist crap is about on Wiki.
These people are the easiest to manipulate, they are dependent on higher castes of their religion to maintain an ignorant bliss of a life.
Sincerely Stupid are the most numerous of the religious castes. Let's make a bullshit estimation and say...60%-70%. This also increases depending on the education system or more precisely, the lack of an education system.


Pragmatist Believer:

Out of all these castes, the Pragmatist Believers are those I despise the most. They have slightly more intellect than the Sincerely Stupid and able to manipulate their religious ideas to suit their own needs.
As you all know, any psychological idea can be shaped and moulded into other ideas that suit you better. That's what the modern psychologists do, they shape your reasoning in a pragmatic way so that you stop crying about every minor thing that happened to you.
These people do it automatically, if some religious rule doesn't suit their current profits they just change it.
They will claim that it was written in the cryptic holy texts, "...and then St. Xavier approved that I can sell drugs because it was made by God...".
These people have no honour or anything, they just change the religion to their needs. And these people are one of the main driving force being religious evolution, since the rewritten even the holy text or the saying of their God to their needs.
I really can't give any specific examples on these people since they're integrated into the society and I can't even deduce their numbers, but I think they are less in numbers compared to the Sincerely Stupid.
Pragmatist Believers are more educated than their Sincere counterparts. If you educate a religious society you increase the numbers of Pragmatist. Because these people saw the wider world and decided to work their profits into it.

Mass Controller:

Ahh, my favourite people. This caste is in direct relation to the public, they work both with the Sincere and Pragmatists. They usually get money from the Sincere and work with Pragmatist to make that money. Most of the time they work as bosses to the Pragmatists, organizing the money maker rituals and everything.
Contemporary spirit-healers are an awesome example of these people.
If we had to make a christian analogy on this...let me think.
Church goers are the sincerely stupid mixing with the pragmatist believers. Pragmatist Believers are there to get power from the people.
Priest is a hybrid of mass controller and pragmatist believer.
A cardinal would be a mass controller since he has little direct contact with the mass.
Pope would be the Master of the Religion, embodying both the power and influence.
There is not much more to say about Mass Controllers, you've seen these guys around. The cool thing about them is they blend their con-job rituals in sort of an arty show, which spells magic all the way. I really have a boner for these guys, thinking that you can earn such money with just doing what you like. Well, that's art as far as I'm concerned.

Master of the Religion:

The main difference between these and the Mass Controllers is that a Master embodies not only the monetary power but also the influencial power. They embody all aspect of religious power, money, influence, political power, militaristic power and so forth.
Example of these are; Popes, Caliphates, Persian God-Kings, Pharaohs etc.
I would kill two children to become as strong as these guys but no such chance.

Hey Lambda, leave those children alone.

No one would get that anymore, Luci. This is fucking twenty-sixteen.

Sometimes I think I'm the only one listening to Pink Floyd.

I'm sure you are not. There are many people still...

NO! NO! I AM THE ONLY ONE, I'M SO SPECIAL!

Jeeez, fine. Have it your way.

Also this reasoning in mostly valid for other faith institutions such as scientology and Star Wars fans.

Phil o Zoophily : Truths & Lies, Nature of Knowledge

I have a friend named Phil, say hi Phil.

Hi.

 You see, Phil is a zoophiliac. He likes fucking animals. Cats, dogs, pigs, horses, chickens and...

I really like rabbits.

Shut the fuck up, Phil.

So, me and Phil have banded together to tell you about some stuff.

Today's subject is jumbled mess but it's mostly about the nature of knowledge.

Knowledge vs Information

Let's start by defining somethings first.

There is a clear difference between knowledge and information.

Information is the data without any use or apparent practicality.

"I am stupid" is a sentence conducting information to you, but what you are to do with it is not specified.

Knowledge on the other hand is directly derived data from information.

"I am stupid so this post is entirely stupid and doesn't need to be read." the information specifies that my stupidity makes this post redundant and you would do well not to read it. From information we derived the knowledge.

Usually your brain translates information it encounters to knowledge, but this is entirely dependent on your intelligence. In many instances it is also dependent on your knowledge base.

For instance;

"+" is an operator that adds two values together and produces a result.

This is an information. Also you need to have previous knowledge on numbers to properly use this operator.

If I say "What is 2+2?", then you take the information about the "+" operator and having previous knowledge on the values you derive the new knowledge. Which is "4".

Your example sucked, lambda.

Yeah? Well, can you do better, asshole?

 Just say that the information is "Today is rainy."
the knowledge would be "Get an umbrella."

Oh... okay.

Now that Phil cleared things out we can move on.

Your Brain Is A Knowledge Factory

Information you acquire about the world is perceived through your senses and fed into the brain. Which produced the knowledge.

You see that it's raining with your eyes or maybe you heard on the radio a weather forecast and believed it.

Here is the whole process:

Your senses took in the information about the outside world and translated it into useable knowledge.
More like a factory, useless plastic pellets go in, useful plastic dildos come out. Easy.

Enough with the examples, they already got it.

Fine, fine. Hold onto your chickens.

I do.

Ooookay... So what I'm trying to say...

...and fail miserably...

SHUT THE FUCK UP PHIL!

...is that there is a clear difference between the real world, where information is happening. And the mental world where knowledge is produced.

Let's setup the nature of the universe:

As  far as this debate goes, the universe is a mathematical universe which is limited by the laws of physics.

Let's do a food analogy: If math is flour then physics is the baked cake and system is the cake finished with it's decorations and whatnots.

Mathematics are the rules that the universe is based upon, think of math as not so much about the operators and values but as a flow of values within functions. Functions are the underlying properties of a mathematical universe and everything is connected to them. Values are just the initialized quantities which make up the physical universe. Without physics there are no values, just functions.

You are losing it, idiot.

Shut up, Phil.

Physics on the other hand are the rules governing energy and matter. From sub-atomic particles to the entire universe, one law governs the entire thing and that is physics. Chemistry is of course being the more specialized version of physics, which is strictly about the forces keeping matter together and their relations.

System is:

   A system is a set of interacting or interdependent component parts forming a complex/intricate whole. Every system is delineated by its spatial and temporal boundaries, surrounded and influenced by its environment, described by its structure and purpose and expressed in its functioning.

That was the wiki explanation. My understanding of a system is anything that is contained within itself to have some effect into the universe it exists.

Here are examples of systems: Human, State, Planet, Galaxy, Atom, Proton, Gun, Forest.

All these things have elements inside them that interact with the whole and have some effect to the system. Then this system is in turn interracts with the universe.

For instance a state is usually composed of a ruling caste, a military caste and a worker caste. These castes interact with each other in many ways but they also have minor or major effects on the universe. A state might chop down a rain forest and kill lots of animals, which is their major effect. However they might not have the power to alter the geography of the planet they are on, which is their minor effect. Major and minor means, effective and not so effective, respectively.

You fucked everything up, it's a jumbled mess.

I know, Phil. Can't help it, my mind is fucked, I'm sleeping the entire day through and live at nights like a vampire.

Yeah, like a Twilight vampire.

Fuck you.

Fuck you back, bella.

Isn't that the girl vampire?

I don't know man, I like watched only the first movie or so.

Yeah.

Perception and Reality

Up until now we established two things.

1. Our brains are the intermediary between the universe and our mind.
2. A material universe is a mathematical universe confined by the laws of physics.

We can come up with other types of universes but most of the popular ideas including the Abrahamic ones are based upon this kind of material universe with some tweaks.

So this reasoning is valid for most universes.

Your perception is generated by your intelligence, previous knowledge base and your personality. If you hate something then you would be creating the knowledge related to that subject in a negative way.

When you are reading something your mind disects it and gives them to you in a modified way. That is perception.
In this regard perception means that you have a distorted view of the real universe.

This is also proven by visual illusions.

These lines are horizontal

The inner squares are the same color

Having such distorted views about the realities of the universe, we tend to be so cocksure about our correctness and purity.

We have established another fact:
- Our perception is perverted and unrealistic

So how do still live? Why don't we walk into cars and generally increase our population?

The answer is ABSTRACTION.

We cannot and will not know the exact nature of the universe, it's impossible. This means that everything we know is a lie, or a "best representation that our brain can create via sensory inputs".
Everything you think you know is just a virtual reality inside your brain. They are not real. They are a best approximation, an abstraction.

The funny thing is we have to absolutionist extremes in this world. Theists and Atheists. Both these groups claim that they know the nature of the universe and there cannot be any fault to their knowledge.
Theists do this by saying they know the will of God, which is the perfect creator of everything.
Atheists do this by saying that science is awesome and knows a lot.

Well the thing about science is that it is based on physical reality. And the way we learn about scientific facts is through experimentation. Then we conduct this information through people, books and internet, which are all amazingly corruptable.

As a human you can't do all the scientific experiments in every pico-second to see if it is still valid and many experiments is way too impossible to do or expensive. As an individual I don't have the means to recreate every experiment done by CERN in my home. So I have to take other people's word for it.
Science works on too much "trust and faith" don't you think? Like a religion, huh?
Well now that I alienated half of my readers, which are 2 people at most. Let's turn on the other group.

Yes you, theists scum.

Theism works entire on "trust and  faith". You either trust your elders of religion to guide you or you need to have faith that what you think you know is absolutely correct. Those look terribly corruptable to me.

We are alone, Phil. I scared them all away.

Awesome. Let's post porn and sick shit.

I was thinking of writing some more about...

TITS! TITS! EVERYWHERE TITS!

Phil, stop! Oh, god. What the fuck are you doing? Now I have to mark the post 18+. This isn't a porn blog you know.

Who cares. It was AWESOME.

Can I continue?

Fine! Go on with your stupid ass boring shit. It's retarted anyway.

Uhhhh.

Any knowledge that you derive from another person means that you have to trust that person. Human mind and memories are corruptable and illogical in all sense. Even if that person is an amazing genius who can remember everything, still you need to deal with their personal and political views. No matter how "scientific" your knowledge is, it is already corrupted.

This means that every knowledge and information is a lie. As being a sentient your best bet is to get the best approximation to an information as you can. That is why scientific method is better than other methods to acquire knowledge. But the dance of theoretical and practical is always a problem. Where do we start trusting in theoretical and where do we accept it is totally different for all cases. I like theoretical physics as the next guy but are they real? They might be since the math works. But still as you would remember math is constricted by physics in this universe. So they might not be. There is still tons of shit we don't know about physics, so you cannot answer such questions.

The answer to all this dilemma is: WE DON'T KNOW!

There is nothing to be scared with not knowing. Fear of unknown is a monkey instict. And even if you believe in creation then it's something imprinted in us. We fear the unknown but you don't need to be anymore.

Just repeat after me. I don't know a shit about the universe. Again. I don't know anything.
See? Nothing to fear of. There is no evil spirits popping up to eat your soul.

Accept that you are piece of shit stain in the face of the universe. Accept that you don't know shit. 

Most of the people would reject this because of their innate encoding of Ego. And there really is no profit to be had in accepting this path.

So there is no real difference between: Movies, experiences, books, games, holy books, scientific articles. They're all fiction. Some are better fiction but still fiction. Not real.

All reality is fiction and all fiction is crap.

You feeling any better, now that you are done with this stupid post?

No, I feel like shit.

You could have just said, read Soliphism in Wikipedia.

It's Solipsism, not soliphism.

Whatever.